南宋福州の鉄生産 : 『三山志』「爐戸」と沈没船資料による検討
デジタルデータあり
すぐに読む
CiNii Research
全国の図書館の所蔵
国立国会図書館サーチが連携している各図書館等から取得した所蔵情報を表示します。
所蔵館、利用可否等の詳細・最新状況は情報提供元の各館のサイト・データベースで直接ご確認ください。所蔵館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください。詳細は ヘルプ をご覧ください。
書誌情報
この資料の詳細や典拠（同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名）等を確認できます。
- 資料種別
- 記事
- 著者・編者
- 石黒 ひさ子
- 著者標目
- タイトル（掲載誌）
- 東洋学報 : 東洋文庫和文紀要 / 東洋文庫 編
- 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）
- 107(3):2025.12
- 掲載巻
- 107
- 掲載号
- 3
- 掲載ページ
- 137-167
- 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）
- 2025-12
- ISSN（掲載誌）
- 0386-9067
- ISSN-L（掲載誌）
- 0386-9067
- 出版事項（掲載誌）
- 東京 : 東洋文庫
- 出版地（国名コード）
- JP
- 本文の言語コード
- jpn
- NDLC
- 対象利用者
- 一般
- 所蔵機関
- 国立国会図書館
- 請求記号
- Z8-406
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 034517162
- 整理区分コード
- 632
- 要約等
- Previous scholarship has long recognized that large-scale iron production became feasible in China during the Song dynasty. Although estimates of annual output vary, researchers have noted that iron was among the commodities traded in the Southern Seas during the Song–Yuan period. However, recent underwater archaeological investigations have revealed shipwrecks carrying substantial quantities of iron, indicating that iron should be understood not only as a material for domestic production and consumption but also as a significant maritime trade commodity. The Sanshanzhi 三山志, a local gazetteer of Fuzhou whose core content reflects the Chunxi 淳熙 era of the Southern Song, presents several textual and chronological aspects. Nevertheless, its entries on lu-hu 爐戸 (metal production unit) and on iron provide valuable evidence for reassessing regional iron production. A close reading of lu-hu in volume 14 (“Land and People”) shows that most mineral resources reported as being continually exploited were iron deposits, suggesting that the lu-hu were principally engaged in iron production. Iron in volume 41 (“Local Customs and Products”) further cites the Fujian Circuit’s iron prohibition law, which exempted agricultural tools and cooking vessels from state restrictions. Artifacts recovered from shipwrecks mainly consist of iron pots and bar-shaped ingots. The bar iron resembles the teeth of a harrow and can reasonably be classified as an agricultural implement. Given that tools and pots were explicitly exempted under Fujian’s iron prohibition law, export-oriented iron goods were likely limited to items that could be categorized within these exemptions. Although the Sanshanzhi does not allow for the calculation of annual output, it clearly suggests substantial production beyond what official statistics recorded.
- DOI
- 10.24739/0002000824
- オンライン閲覧公開範囲
- インターネット公開
- 掲載誌（NCID）
- AN00169858
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立情報学研究所 : 学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）
- 提供元機関・データベース
- 東洋文庫 : 東洋文庫リポジトリ
- 要約等
- Previous scholarship has long recognized that large-scale iron production became feasible in China during the Song dynasty. Although estimates of annual output vary, researchers have noted that iron was among the commodities traded in the Southern Seas during the Song–Yuan period. However, recent underwater archaeological investigations have revealed shipwrecks carrying substantial quantities of iron, indicating that iron should be understood not only as a material for domestic production and consumption but also as a significant maritime trade commodity. The Sanshanzhi 三山志, a local gazetteer of Fuzhou whose core content reflects the Chunxi 淳熙 era of the Southern Song, presents several textual and chronological aspects. Nevertheless, its entries on lu-hu 爐戸 (metal production unit) and on iron provide valuable evidence for reassessing regional iron production. A close reading of lu-hu in volume 14 (“Land and People”) shows that most mineral resources reported as being continually exploited were iron deposits, suggesting that the lu-hu were principally engaged in iron production. Iron in volume 41 (“Local Customs and Products”) further cites the Fujian Circuit’s iron prohibition law, which exempted agricultural tools and cooking vessels from state restrictions. Artifacts recovered from shipwrecks mainly consist of iron pots and bar-shaped ingots. The bar iron resembles the teeth of a harrow and can reasonably be classified as an agricultural implement. Given that tools and pots were explicitly exempted under Fujian’s iron prohibition law, export-oriented iron goods were likely limited to items that could be categorized within these exemptions. Although the Sanshanzhi does not allow for the calculation of annual output, it clearly suggests substantial production beyond what official statistics recorded.
- DOI
- 10.24739/0002000824
- 関連情報（URI）
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
- 提供元機関・データベース
- Japan Link Center学術機関リポジトリデータベース雑誌記事索引データベース
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 034517162