敦煌写本「上大夫」(蒙書「上大人」の敦煌版)研究百年簡史 : 劉復「燉煌掇瑣叙目」公表一百周年に寄せて
デジタルデータあり
すぐに読む
CiNii Research
全国の図書館の所蔵
国立国会図書館サーチが連携している各図書館等から取得した所蔵情報を表示します。
所蔵館、利用可否等の詳細・最新状況は情報提供元の各館のサイト・データベースで直接ご確認ください。所蔵館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください。詳細は ヘルプ をご覧ください。
書誌情報
この資料の詳細や典拠（同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名）等を確認できます。
- 資料種別
- 記事
- 著者・編者
- 海野 洋平
- 著者標目
- タイトル（掲載誌）
- 東洋学報 : 東洋文庫和文紀要 / 東洋文庫 編
- 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）
- 107(3):2025.12
- 掲載巻
- 107
- 掲載号
- 3
- 掲載ページ
- 169-200
- 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）
- 2025-12
- ISSN（掲載誌）
- 0386-9067
- ISSN-L（掲載誌）
- 0386-9067
- 出版事項（掲載誌）
- 東京 : 東洋文庫
- 出版地（国名コード）
- JP
- 本文の言語コード
- jpn
- NDLC
- 対象利用者
- 一般
- 所蔵機関
- 国立国会図書館
- 請求記号
- Z8-406
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 034517173
- 整理区分コード
- 632
- 要約等
- “Shangdaren” 上大人 was a popular children’s text on penmanship that existed in pre-modern China. As Zhai Hao 翟灝 (1736–1788) found, its philological roots can be traced back to a Zen riddle of a ninth-century monk, Chen zunsu 陳尊宿 (also known as Muzhou Daozong 睦州道蹤). However, the roots can probably be traced even further back via the Dunhuang 敦煌 manuscripts. “Shangdafu” 上大夫, a variant of “Shangdaren” found in the Dunhuang manuscripts, has been studied for one hundred years, ever since Liu Fu 劉復 first reported on Dunhuang MS P.3145v in his “Dunhuang duosuo xumu” 燉煌掇瑣叙目 (1925). In this paper, I will provide a brief overview of the research conducted over the past hundred-years, dividing it into the three periods. Occasional research on “Shangdafu” in Period I (1925–1986) did not flourish into a new research trend. Period II (1987–2007) began with research of two great scholars, Wang Liqi 王利器 and Liu Mingshu 劉銘恕 and progressed steadily. The issues Liu raised have served particularly well as a guideline for researchers of “Shangdafu.” After he raised the issues, the number of “Shangdafu” examples gradually increased and some papers treated it as their central theme. However, there were still too few examples in the second period for research to advance any further. In Period III (2008–present), the number of examples of “Shangdafu” increased further and made more detailed research possible. Achievements such as “isolation” or separation of a companion text “Niuyang qiankou” 牛羊千口 from “Shangdafu,” and clarification on some unique characters in “Shangdafu” have been made in this third period. Most examples of the “Shangdafu” in the Dunhuang manuscripts have common characteristics such as similar character variants and missing phrases. On the other hand, some examples have characters and phrases that are the same as those in the existing “Shangdaren” text. The position of the “Shangdafu” in the Dunhuang manuscripts in the philological history of “Shangdaren” is still problematic. The dating of the manuscripts is still a work in progress and determining dates of text formation beyond Zhai Hao’s estimate remains exceedingly difficult. But some significant achievements have been made in the revision of characters.
- DOI
- 10.24739/0002000825
- オンライン閲覧公開範囲
- インターネット公開
- 掲載誌（NCID）
- AN00169858
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立情報学研究所 : 学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）
- 提供元機関・データベース
- 東洋文庫 : 東洋文庫リポジトリ
- 要約等
- “Shangdaren” 上大人 was a popular children’s text on penmanship that existed in pre-modern China. As Zhai Hao 翟灝 (1736–1788) found, its philological roots can be traced back to a Zen riddle of a ninth-century monk, Chen zunsu 陳尊宿 (also known as Muzhou Daozong 睦州道蹤). However, the roots can probably be traced even further back via the Dunhuang 敦煌 manuscripts. “Shangdafu” 上大夫, a variant of “Shangdaren” found in the Dunhuang manuscripts, has been studied for one hundred years, ever since Liu Fu 劉復 first reported on Dunhuang MS P.3145v in his “Dunhuang duosuo xumu” 燉煌掇瑣叙目 (1925). In this paper, I will provide a brief overview of the research conducted over the past hundred-years, dividing it into the three periods. Occasional research on “Shangdafu” in Period I (1925–1986) did not flourish into a new research trend. Period II (1987–2007) began with research of two great scholars, Wang Liqi 王利器 and Liu Mingshu 劉銘恕 and progressed steadily. The issues Liu raised have served particularly well as a guideline for researchers of “Shangdafu.” After he raised the issues, the number of “Shangdafu” examples gradually increased and some papers treated it as their central theme. However, there were still too few examples in the second period for research to advance any further. In Period III (2008–present), the number of examples of “Shangdafu” increased further and made more detailed research possible. Achievements such as “isolation” or separation of a companion text “Niuyang qiankou” 牛羊千口 from “Shangdafu,” and clarification on some unique characters in “Shangdafu” have been made in this third period. Most examples of the “Shangdafu” in the Dunhuang manuscripts have common characteristics such as similar character variants and missing phrases. On the other hand, some examples have characters and phrases that are the same as those in the existing “Shangdaren” text. The position of the “Shangdafu” in the Dunhuang manuscripts in the philological history of “Shangdaren” is still problematic. The dating of the manuscripts is still a work in progress and determining dates of text formation beyond Zhai Hao’s estimate remains exceedingly difficult. But some significant achievements have been made in the revision of characters.
- DOI
- 10.24739/0002000825
- 関連情報（URI）
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
- 提供元機関・データベース
- Japan Link Center学術機関リポジトリデータベース雑誌記事索引データベース
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 034517173