1940年代イギリスにおける住宅構想とその現実--ポーツマスとコヴェントリーを中心にして
デジタルデータあり（科学技術振興機構）
すぐに読む
J-STAGE
全国の図書館の所蔵
国立国会図書館以外の全国の図書館の所蔵状況を表示します。
所蔵のある図書館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください
その他
J-STAGE
デジタルCiNii Research
検索サービスデジタル連携先のサイトで、CiNii Researchが連携している機関・データベースの所蔵状況を確認できます。
書誌情報
この資料の詳細や典拠（同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名）等を確認できます。
- 資料種別
- 記事
- 著者・編者
- 椿 建也
- 著者標目
- タイトル（掲載誌）
- 社会経済史学 = Socio-economic history / 社会経済史学会 編
- 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）
- 61(1) 1995.05
- 掲載巻
- 61
- 掲載号
- 1
- 掲載ページ
- p1～29
- 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）
- 1995-05
- ISSN（掲載誌）
- 0038-0113
- ISSN-L（掲載誌）
- 0038-0113
- 出版事項（掲載誌）
- 東京 : 社会経済史学会 ; 1931-
- 出版地（国名コード）
- JP
- 本文の言語コード
- jpn
- NDLC
- 対象利用者
- 一般
- 記事種別、記事分類
- 記事分類: 社会・労働--生活--住宅
- 所蔵機関
- 国立国会図書館
- 請求記号
- Z3-408
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 3284635
- 整理区分コード
- 632
- 要約等
- The existing historiography has done much to highlight the impact of the Second World War on social reform in Britain. Indeed the extensive damage done to major British cities and their housing stock provided a unique opportunity for architects and town planners to set a new standard in postwar housing, which would deal with slums as well as with the problem of urban sprawl. Accordingly the idea of neighbourhood unit planning was promoted, with its mix of dwelling types and provision of social facilities. This article, by considering the contrasting cases of two blitzed cities, Portsmouth and Coventry, examines how the design solutions advanced by these experts intersected both with public opinion and the implementation of housing policy under the 1945 Labour Government. The picture that emerges is of Portsmouth, prompted by Whitehall and operating in a relatively favourable environment, choosing to concentrate on the basics in housing provision. In Coventry, on the other hand, the priority given to industrial expansion because of the plight of the British eoonomy represented a constant threat to the city council's housing programme with its central idea of providing for the community. Yet the performances of the two cities in terms of housebuilding were very similar and there is evidence that their experience was typical of what was happening elsewhere in the late 1940s : the high standard of individual houses contrasted with the poor provision of social facilities on new housing estates. Thus the realities in popular housing provision did not match the high hopes of architects and planners. Their influence was very much circumscribed by the difficult economic circumstances of the late 1940s and by the existence of conservative, anti-planning forcesin society.
- DOI
- 10.20624/sehs.61.1_1
- オンライン閲覧公開範囲
- インターネット公開
- 連携機関・データベース
- 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE
- 要約等
- The existing historiography has done much to highlight the impact of the Second World War on social reform in Britain. Indeed the extensive damage done to major British cities and their housing stock provided a unique opportunity for architects and town planners to set a new standard in postwar housing, which would deal with slums as well as with the problem of urban sprawl. Accordingly the idea of neighbourhood unit planning was promoted, with its mix of dwelling types and provision of social facilities. This article, by considering the contrasting cases of two blitzed cities, Portsmouth and Coventry, examines how the design solutions advanced by these experts intersected both with public opinion and the implementation of housing policy under the 1945 Labour Government. The picture that emerges is of Portsmouth, prompted by Whitehall and operating in a relatively favourable environment, choosing to concentrate on the basics in housing provision. In Coventry, on the other hand, the priority given to industrial expansion because of the plight of the British eoonomy represented a constant threat to the city council's housing programme with its central idea of providing for the community. Yet the performances of the two cities in terms of housebuilding were very similar and there is evidence that their experience was typical of what was happening elsewhere in the late 1940s : the high standard of individual houses contrasted with the poor provision of social facilities on new housing estates. Thus the realities in popular housing provision did not match the high hopes of architects and planners. Their influence was very much circumscribed by the difficult economic circumstances of the late 1940s and by the existence of conservative, anti-planning forcesin society.
- DOI
- 10.20624/sehs.61.1_1
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
- 提供元機関・データベース
- Japan Link Center雑誌記事索引データベースCiNii Articles
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 3284635
- NII論文ID
- 110001214109