重授戒灌頂における三昧耶戒

• Material Type: 記事
• Title: 重授戒灌頂における三昧耶戒
• Author/Editor: 寺本 亮晋
• Author Heading: 寺本 亮晋
• Alternative Title: The Samaya Precepts in the Context of Renewing Precept Consecration
• Periodical title: 印度學佛教學研究
• No. or year of volume/issue: 65(2)=141:2017.3
• Volume: 65
• Issue: 2
• Sequential issue number: 141
• Pages: 622-627
• Publication date of volume/issue (W3CDTF): 2017-03
• ISSN (Periodical Title): 0019-4344
• ISSN-L (Periodical Title): 0019-4344
• Publication (Periodical Title): [東京] : 日本印度学仏教学会
• Place of Publication (Country Code): JP
• Text Language Code: jpn
• Subject Heading: 戒灌頂; 光宗; 『渓嵐拾葉集』; 事理俱密戒; 仁空
• NDLC: ZH7
• Target Audience: 一般
• Holding library: 国立国会図書館
• Call No.: Z9-55
• Data Provider (Database): 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• Bibliographic ID (NDL): 028080098; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/028080098
• Bibliographic Record Category (NDL): 632

• Summary, etc.: <p>Concerning the relation between the perfect precepts (<i>enkai </i>円戒) and the samaya precepts (<i>samayakai </i>三昧耶戒) goes back to the time of the renewal of vows. An oral tradition relates the perfect sudden vows to the <i>rihimitsu </i>理秘密<i> </i>(“theoretical truth within mysticism”), and the samaya vows to the <i>jiri kumitsu </i>事理俱密 (“juxtaposition of both theory and practice within mysticism”). This goes back to Ennin 円仁. It is not only the secret oral transmission of the 14th c. Tendai priest Kōshū 光宗 (1276–1350), but also is found in various records. This oral tradition is also given authority by the circumstances gathered together in the legends of Tendai monks gathered by Enchin 円珍 (814–891). However, Ninkū 仁空 (1309–1388) belonged to a different sect, and criticized the precept ordination. Naturally, this oral tradition, the <i>jiri kumitsu </i>and the Tendai monk legends do not record this. However, beside the tradition of Ninkū the matter is transmitted, and these oral traditions go back to Tankū 湛空 (1176–1253). The development of the precept consecration relies on an oral transmission from Tankū and spread far and wide. </p>
• DOI: 10.4259/ibk.65.2_622
• Access Restrictions: インターネット公開
• Data Provider (Database): 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE; http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp

• Summary, etc.: <p>Concerning the relation between the perfect precepts (<i>enkai </i>円戒) and the samaya precepts (<i>samayakai </i>三昧耶戒) goes back to the time of the renewal of vows. An oral tradition relates the perfect sudden vows to the <i>rihimitsu </i>理秘密<i> </i>(“theoretical truth within mysticism”), and the samaya vows to the <i>jiri kumitsu </i>事理俱密 (“juxtaposition of both theory and practice within mysticism”). This goes back to Ennin 円仁. It is not only the secret oral transmission of the 14th c. Tendai priest Kōshū 光宗 (1276–1350), but also is found in various records. This oral tradition is also given authority by the circumstances gathered together in the legends of Tendai monks gathered by Enchin 円珍 (814–891). However, Ninkū 仁空 (1309–1388) belonged to a different sect, and criticized the precept ordination. Naturally, this oral tradition, the <i>jiri kumitsu </i>and the Tendai monk legends do not record this. However, beside the tradition of Ninkū the matter is transmitted, and these oral traditions go back to Tankū 湛空 (1176–1253). The development of the precept consecration relies on an oral transmission from Tankū and spread far and wide. </p>
• DOI: 10.4259/ibk.65.2_622; https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.65.2_622
• Related Material (URI): http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/028080098; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I028080098; https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ibk/65/2/65_622/_pdf
• Data Provider (Database): 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research; https://cir.nii.ac.jp/
• Original Data Provider (Database): Japan Link Center; https://japanlinkcenter.org/top; 雑誌記事索引データベース; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp; Crossref; https://www.crossref.org; CiNii Articles
• Bibliographic ID (NDL): 028080098; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/028080098
• NAID: 130006314767