ジョン・ロックにおける快楽と苦痛の原理 : エピクロスとの比較を通じて

• 資料種別: 記事
• タイトル: ジョン・ロックにおける快楽と苦痛の原理 : エピクロスとの比較を通じて
• 著者・編者: 渡邊 裕一
• 著者標目: 渡邊 裕一
• 並列タイトル等: John Locke on the Hedonistic Principle : A Comparison with Epicureanism
• タイトル（掲載誌）: 学習院大学人文科学論集 / 学習院大学大学院人文科学研究科 [編]
• 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）: (22):2013
• 掲載号: 22
• 掲載ページ: 1-27
• 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）: 2013
• ISSN（掲載誌）: 0919-0791
• ISSN-L（掲載誌）: 0919-0791
• 出版事項（掲載誌）: 東京 : 学習院大学大学院人文科学研究科
• 出版地（国名コード）: JP
• 本文の言語コード: jpn
• 件名標目: 自然法論; エピクロス主義; 快楽主義; 道徳的善悪; 正義論
• NDLC: ZV1
• 対象利用者: 一般
• 所蔵機関: 国立国会図書館
• 請求記号: Z22-1706
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 024989643; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/024989643
• 整理区分コード: 632

• 要約等: application/pdf; This paper considers whether Locke's moral philosophy should be classified as a version of hedonism or as a kind of deontology. We know, on the one hand, that Locke has established a system of the law of nature. He sees the law of nature as the order imposed by God who created human beings and other creatures. We are also aware, on the other hand, that Locke has referred to the hedonistic principle of human actions, one that describes in terms of pleasures and pains how human beings are actually motivated to act. The former position seems to imply a non-consequentialist theory; the latter shows an affinity with utilitarianism. These positions seem to be in conflict. This paper pays close attention to the relationship which seems to hold between Locke's theory and Epicureanism, treating the latter as a type of ethical hedonism. Catherine Wilson points out that there is a similarity between Locke's and Epicurus's moral theory. She regards Locke's theory of natural law as a minimal moral framework, one that supplies basic ethical postulates while also leaving some liberty for the individuals concerned. Wilson claims that Locke followed the Epicurean tradition. However, Locke's theory of natural law serves as a system of absolute rules by which God commands the actions of his creatures. Liberty, says Locke, consists not in acting arbitrarily, but in controlling each one's property within the limits of the law of nature. This paper concludes that Locke's hedonistic principle is a general description of the motive of human actions, while it does not provide a norm for moral actions. While Epicurus's moral theory is a version of ethical hedonism based on a particular conception of human nature, Locke's own theory is a kind of deontology which rests on the law of nature.
• 関連情報（URI）: http://hdl.handle.net/10959/3815; https://glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/3325; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/024989643; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I024989643
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research; https://cir.nii.ac.jp/
• 提供元機関・データベース: 学術機関リポジトリデータベース; https://irdb.nii.ac.jp; 雑誌記事索引データベース; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp; CiNii Articles
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 024989643; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/024989643
• NII論文ID: 110009625468