世紀転換期イギリスの新自由主義とフェビアン主義--社会改良と帝国主義の関連を中心に(〔土地制度史学会〕大会報告・共通論題:新自由主義--その理論的・歴史的検討)

• 資料種別: 記事
• タイトル: 世紀転換期イギリスの新自由主義とフェビアン主義--社会改良と帝国主義の関連を中心に
• 著者・編者: 藤井 透
• シリーズタイトル: 〔土地制度史学会〕大会報告・共通論題:新自由主義--その理論的・歴史的検討
• 著者標目: 藤井 透
• タイトル（掲載誌）: 土地制度史學 = The journal of political economy and economic history
• 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）: 43(3) (通号 171) 2001.4
• 掲載巻: 43
• 掲載号: 3
• 掲載通号: 171
• 掲載ページ: 19～27
• 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）: 2001-04
• ISSN（掲載誌）: 0493-3567
• ISSN-L（掲載誌）: 0493-3567
• 出版事項（掲載誌）: 東京 : 土地制度史學会 ; 1953-2002
• 出版地（国名コード）: JP
• 本文の言語コード: jpn
• NDLC: ZR8
• 対象利用者: 一般
• 所蔵機関: 国立国会図書館
• 請求記号: Z18-561
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 5771990; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/5771990
• 整理区分コード: 632

• 要約等: Social reform and imperialism were the greatest political questions in Britain at the turn of the century. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the difference between the new liberalism and Fabianism of the time by comparing how J.A. Hobson and the Webbs understood the relations between them. In this paper, I point out that the difference between Hobson and the Webbs derives from their respective methods of study. Hobson's method was based on deduction while the Webbs' method was based on induction, and this led to the different ways in which they evaluated social policy. Since Hobson evaluated individual policies from the standpoint of deduction, he showed little attachment to implementing any particular policy. On the other hand, the Webbs conceptualized the notion of the National Minimum on the basis of how to guarantee a minimum standard of living for the workers in the context of trade unionism. The Webbs propagated the philosophy and policy of the National Minimum based on their faith that this method, the newest to appear in history, was the most effective policy for the future. On the other hand, although this has been neglected in the past, there are many points in common between Hobson and the Webbs. First, they had a common awareness of the need to address the social problems that had become apparent at the end of the nineteenth century. Second, they believed that specific social problems were the "diseases" of capitalism or social institutions. Third, they had a shared aspiration to an economics which emphasized the consumer. Finally, since Hobson opposed the Anglo Boer War while the Webbs supported the war, it may seem that they held different views of imperialism. However, a close reading of Hobson's Imperialism and the Fabian Society's Fabianism and the Empire reveals a common "racist" stance. In other words, both parties opposed self government by "lower races" or "colored natives".
• DOI: 10.20633/tochiseido.43.3_19
• オンライン閲覧公開範囲: インターネット公開
• 連携機関・データベース: 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE; http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp

• 要約等: Social reform and imperialism were the greatest political questions in Britain at the turn of the century. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the difference between the new liberalism and Fabianism of the time by comparing how J.A. Hobson and the Webbs understood the relations between them. In this paper, I point out that the difference between Hobson and the Webbs derives from their respective methods of study. Hobson's method was based on deduction while the Webbs' method was based on induction, and this led to the different ways in which they evaluated social policy. Since Hobson evaluated individual policies from the standpoint of deduction, he showed little attachment to implementing any particular policy. On the other hand, the Webbs conceptualized the notion of the National Minimum on the basis of how to guarantee a minimum standard of living for the workers in the context of trade unionism. The Webbs propagated the philosophy and policy of the National Minimum based on their faith that this method, the newest to appear in history, was the most effective policy for the future. On the other hand, although this has been neglected in the past, there are many points in common between Hobson and the Webbs. First, they had a common awareness of the need to address the social problems that had become apparent at the end of the nineteenth century. Second, they believed that specific social problems were the "diseases" of capitalism or social institutions. Third, they had a shared aspiration to an economics which emphasized the consumer. Finally, since Hobson opposed the Anglo Boer War while the Webbs supported the war, it may seem that they held different views of imperialism. However, a close reading of Hobson's Imperialism and the Fabian Society's Fabianism and the Empire reveals a common "racist" stance. In other words, both parties opposed self government by "lower races" or "colored natives".
• DOI: 10.20633/tochiseido.43.3_19; https://doi.org/10.20633/tochiseido.43.3_19
• 関連情報（URI）: http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/5771990; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I5771990
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research; https://cir.nii.ac.jp/
• 提供元機関・データベース: Japan Link Center; https://japanlinkcenter.org/top; 雑誌記事索引データベース; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp; CiNii Articles
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 5771990; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/5771990
• NII論文ID: 110007020196