序説 現代史としてのベトナム戦争 (現代史としてのベトナム戦争)
デジタルデータあり（科学技術振興機構）
すぐに読む
J-STAGE
全国の図書館の所蔵
国立国会図書館以外の全国の図書館の所蔵状況を表示します。
所蔵のある図書館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください
その他
J-STAGE
デジタルCiNii Research
検索サービスデジタル連携先のサイトで、CiNii Researchが連携している機関・データベースの所蔵状況を確認できます。
書誌情報
この資料の詳細や典拠（同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名）等を確認できます。
- 資料種別
- 記事
- タイトル
- 著者・編者
- 油井 大三郎
- シリーズタイトル
- 著者標目
- タイトル（掲載誌）
- 国際政治 / 日本国際政治学会 編
- 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）
- (通号 130) 2002.5
- 掲載通号
- 130
- 掲載ページ
- 1～16
- 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）
- 2002-05
- ISSN（掲載誌）
- 0454-2215
- ISSN-L（掲載誌）
- 0454-2215
- 出版事項（掲載誌）
- 小平 : 日本国際政治学会
- 出版地（国名コード）
- JP
- 本文の言語コード
- jpn
- NDLC
- 対象利用者
- 一般
- 所蔵機関
- 国立国会図書館
- 請求記号
- Z1-30
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 6213994
- 整理区分コード
- 632
- 要約等
- A quarter century has passed since the end of the Vietnam War. With the opening of records not only in the United States but also in Vietnam, the former Soviet Union and China, along with the publication of testimony by participants, the image of the war has undergone major revisions. The United States, for example, with the trend toward conservatism in American politics since the 1980s, has seen the emergence of a “hawkish revisionism, ” largely driven by commanders who served in the war, politicians and commentators. These revisionist hawks argue that “America lost a winnable war, ” whether because civilian leaders tied the military's hands by insisting on fighting a “limited war” or because of “interference” by the mass media and antiwar demonstrators.<br>In response, liberals argued that the war was a tragic over-intervention arising from anticommunism and an illusion of omnipotence in an area where the United States had no compelling national interests. With radicals arguing, meanwhile, that American intervention in Vietnam was inevitable to secure Southeast Asian resources and markets and to liberalize global trade, heated debate over the war flared up again in the United States in 1985 on the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the collapse of the Saigon regime.<br>The end of the Cold War in the early 1990s led to progress in opening the Soviet diplomatic archives, while the adoption of open economic policies in China and Vietnam resulted in partial opening of archives in those countries. As a result, scholars can now research the Vietnam War not only from the American perspective but in a multi-dimensional way, taking into account the North Vietnamese, Chinese and Soviet perspectives as well.<br>This special issue reflects the expansion in perspectives on the war, with articles drawing not only on English-language sources but on Vietnamese-and Chinese-language sources as well, and analyzing trends in countries in the region such as Japan, Laos and Cambodia. This kind of multidimensional approach based on the mining of diverse sources is characteristic of today's scholarship, and is the reason we have titled this special issue “The Vietnam War as Contemporary History.”
- DOI
- 10.11375/kokusaiseiji1957.130_1
- オンライン閲覧公開範囲
- インターネット公開
- 連携機関・データベース
- 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE
- 要約等
- A quarter century has passed since the end of the Vietnam War. With the opening of records not only in the United States but also in Vietnam, the former Soviet Union and China, along with the publication of testimony by participants, the image of the war has undergone major revisions. The United States, for example, with the trend toward conservatism in American politics since the 1980s, has seen the emergence of a “hawkish revisionism, ” largely driven by commanders who served in the war, politicians and commentators. These revisionist hawks argue that “America lost a winnable war, ” whether because civilian leaders tied the military's hands by insisting on fighting a “limited war” or because of “interference” by the mass media and antiwar demonstrators.<br>In response, liberals argued that the war was a tragic over-intervention arising from anticommunism and an illusion of omnipotence in an area where the United States had no compelling national interests. With radicals arguing, meanwhile, that American intervention in Vietnam was inevitable to secure Southeast Asian resources and markets and to liberalize global trade, heated debate over the war flared up again in the United States in 1985 on the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the collapse of the Saigon regime.<br>The end of the Cold War in the early 1990s led to progress in opening the Soviet diplomatic archives, while the adoption of open economic policies in China and Vietnam resulted in partial opening of archives in those countries. As a result, scholars can now research the Vietnam War not only from the American perspective but in a multi-dimensional way, taking into account the North Vietnamese, Chinese and Soviet perspectives as well.<br>This special issue reflects the expansion in perspectives on the war, with articles drawing not only on English-language sources but on Vietnamese-and Chinese-language sources as well, and analyzing trends in countries in the region such as Japan, Laos and Cambodia. This kind of multidimensional approach based on the mining of diverse sources is characteristic of today's scholarship, and is the reason we have titled this special issue “The Vietnam War as Contemporary History.”
- DOI
- 10.11375/kokusaiseiji1957.130_1
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
- 提供元機関・データベース
- Japan Link Center雑誌記事索引データベースCiNii Articles
- 書誌ID（NDLBibID）
- 6213994
- NII論文ID
- 110000439823