本文へ移動
文治の守護・地頭問題...

文治の守護・地頭問題の基礎的考察

記事を表すアイコン

文治の守護・地頭問題の基礎的考察

国立国会図書館請求記号
Z8-321
国立国会図書館書誌ID
3381599
資料種別
記事
著者
三田 武繁
出版者
東京 : 史学会 ; 1889-
出版年
1991-01
資料形態
デジタル
掲載誌名
史学雑誌 / 史学会 編 100(1) 1991.01
掲載ページ
p1~35
詳細を見る

資料詳細

要約等:

The object of this article is to reexamine the theory of the Kunijitoshiki (国地頭職) in order to study the formation of the Shugo and Jito system within ...

全国の図書館の所蔵

国立国会図書館サーチが連携している各図書館等から取得した所蔵情報を表示します。

所蔵館、利用可否等の詳細・最新状況は情報提供元の各館のサイト・データベースで直接ご確認ください。所蔵館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください。詳細は ヘルプ をご覧ください。

その他

書誌情報

この資料の詳細や典拠(同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名)等を確認できます。

デジタル

資料種別
記事
著者・編者
三田 武繁
著者標目
タイトル(掲載誌)
史学雑誌 / 史学会 編
巻号年月日等(掲載誌)
100(1) 1991.01
掲載巻
100
掲載号
1
掲載ページ
p1~35
掲載年月日(W3CDTF)
1991-01
ISSN(掲載誌)
0018-2478
ISSN-L(掲載誌)
0018-2478
出版事項(掲載誌)
東京 : 史学会 ; 1889-
出版地(国名コード)
JP
本文の言語コード
jpn
NDLC
対象利用者
一般
記事種別、記事分類
記事分類: 歴史・地理--日本史--鎌倉・室町時代
コレクション(共通)
コレクション(障害者向け資料:レベル1)
コレクション(障害者向け資料:レベル2)
コレクション(個別)
国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > デジタル化資料 > 雑誌
オンライン閲覧公開範囲
国立国会図書館内限定公開
デジタル化資料送信
図書館・個人送信対象外
遠隔複写可否(NDL)
可
所蔵機関
国立国会図書館
請求記号
Z8-321
掲載誌(国立国会図書館永続的識別子)
info:ndljp/pid/11199258
連携機関・データベース
国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引
書誌ID(NDLBibID)
3381599
整理区分コード
632

デジタル

要約等
The object of this article is to reexamine the theory of the Kunijitoshiki (国地頭職) in order to study the formation of the Shugo and Jito system within the Kamakura government. Since the discovery of the kunijitoshiki, the vast majority of previous studies have recognized its existence, that is to say, it has been an established theory that the content of the petition to the court in November in 1185, which was made by Hojo Tokimasa (北条時政), a messenger dispatched by Minamoto no Yoritomo (源頼朝), was the original kunijitoshiki. However, in this article the author attempts to examine the existence of the kunijitoshiki in itself, in the light of the confusibn of previous studies, especially on the relationship between the kunijitoshiki and sotsuibushi (惣追捕使). First, the author confirms the content of the petition. It is aimed principally at establishing sotsuibushi in the western provinces to track down Minamoto no Yoshitsune (源義経) and other outlaws. Furthermore, the following two rights petitioned for at the same time, the right to collect provision rice, and the right to dispose of mokkanryo (没官領) were based in the Sotsuibushi. Secondly, the author analyzes the content of the negotiations, between the court and Tokimasa in March in 1186. The analysis shows that the shichikakokujitoshiki (七カ国地頭職), which is regarded as the only concrete evidence for the existence of the kunijitoshiki, was a general name of the shogojitoshiki (荘郷地頭職) established in seven provinces. Thirdly, the author examines the kyukokujito (九国地頭), the shikokujito (四国地頭), and the Kamakuradonokannoshi (鎌倉殿勧農使), which are regarded as the direct predecessors of the kunijitoshiki, but were different from the kunijitoshiki in kind. On the basis of these examinations, the author denies the existence of a kunijitoshiki within the kamakura government. Therefore, it is not necessary to take account of the kunijitoshiki when studying the formation of the shugo and jito system of that Government.
DOI
10.24471/shigaku.100.1_1
オンライン閲覧公開範囲
インターネット公開
連携機関・データベース
科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE

デジタル

要約等
The object of this article is to reexamine the theory of the Kunijitoshiki (国地頭職) in order to study the formation of the Shugo and Jito system within the Kamakura government. Since the discovery of the kunijitoshiki, the vast majority of previous studies have recognized its existence, that is to say, it has been an established theory that the content of the petition to the court in November in 1185, which was made by Hojo Tokimasa (北条時政), a messenger dispatched by Minamoto no Yoritomo (源頼朝), was the original kunijitoshiki. However, in this article the author attempts to examine the existence of the kunijitoshiki in itself, in the light of the confusibn of previous studies, especially on the relationship between the kunijitoshiki and sotsuibushi (惣追捕使). First, the author confirms the content of the petition. It is aimed principally at establishing sotsuibushi in the western provinces to track down Minamoto no Yoshitsune (源義経) and other outlaws. Furthermore, the following two rights petitioned for at the same time, the right to collect provision rice, and the right to dispose of mokkanryo (没官領) were based in the Sotsuibushi. Secondly, the author analyzes the content of the negotiations, between the court and Tokimasa in March in 1186. The analysis shows that the shichikakokujitoshiki (七カ国地頭職), which is regarded as the only concrete evidence for the existence of the kunijitoshiki, was a general name of the shogojitoshiki (荘郷地頭職) established in seven provinces. Thirdly, the author examines the kyukokujito (九国地頭), the shikokujito (四国地頭), and the Kamakuradonokannoshi (鎌倉殿勧農使), which are regarded as the direct predecessors of the kunijitoshiki, but were different from the kunijitoshiki in kind. On the basis of these examinations, the author denies the existence of a kunijitoshiki within the kamakura government. Therefore, it is not necessary to take account of the kunijitoshiki when studying the formation of the shugo and jito system of that Government.
連携機関・データベース
国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
提供元機関・データベース
Japan Link Center
雑誌記事索引データベース
CiNii Articles
書誌ID(NDLBibID)
3381599
NII論文ID
110002366453