Study on Evaluation of Cavity Preparation Using Non-contact High-speed 3-D Shape Measuring Device
デジタルデータあり（大阪歯科大学学術リポジトリ）
すぐに読む
学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）
書店で探す
全国の図書館の所蔵
国立国会図書館以外の全国の図書館の所蔵状況を表示します。
所蔵のある図書館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください
その他
大阪歯科大学学術リポジトリ
デジタル連携先のサイトで、学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）が連携している機関・データベースの所蔵状況を確認できます。大阪歯科大学学術リポジトリのサイトで この本を確認
書店で探す
書誌情報
この資料の詳細や典拠（同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名）等を確認できます。
- 資料種別
- 博士論文
- タイトル
- 著者・編者
- 奥村, 瑳恵子
- 並列タイトル等
- 非接触・高速三次元形状計測機を用いた窩洞形成評価の検討
- 授与機関名
- 大阪歯科大学
- 報告番号
- 甲第919号
- 学位
- 博士（歯学）
- 対象利用者
- 一般
- 一般注記
- 出版タイプ： VoRIntroduction: In dental education, it has long been essential to master cavity preparation techniques by training with models, both during basic and clinical training before college graduation as well as during clinical practice as dentists. However, the instruction given is subjective depending on the instructor, with variations in instruction contents and evaluations, and it has long been pointed that quantification is difficult. Effective and efficient education and instruction as well as reproducible and objective evaluations are essential. Therefore, this study examined the objective evaluation and grading of Class II metal inlay cavity by a computer system using a non-contact high-speed 3-D shape measuring device.Subjects and methods: Ten dental residents at the Department of Operative Dentistry, Osaka Dental University Hospital were recruited as subjects. A jaw model containing an artificial tooth for training was used to conduct cavity preparation for a mesial Class II metal inlay on the mandibular right first molar tooth within 30 minutes. After preparation, an evaluation was conducted by this system and by nine instructors at the Department of Operative Dentistry with 7 to 28 years of clinical experience. A free description column for the evaluation and instruction items was provided as part of the evaluation by instructors. Feedback was given based on the results, and a total of five sessions of cavity preparation were conducted at two-month intervals. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used in the correlation analysis of the evaluation results.Results: Reanalysis was conducted by excluding the seven points which had the largest deductions in the evaluation using the measuring device. As a consequence, a significant positive correlation with the number of preparations was observed. There was also a significant positive correlation with the evaluation by instructors. A comparison of the evaluations by the measuring device and by the instructors showed a significant positive correlation.Conclusion: The measuring device can consistently and objectively evaluate Class II metal inlay cavity preparation equivalent to evaluations by multiple instructors with long clinical experience. It was also shown that a curriculum using evaluations by the measuring device and instructors effectively improved the skills of the dental residents. Incorporating evaluation by the measuring device may be an effective method for reducing the burden on instructors and length of the instruction period.2021年度