図書
From moral theology to moral philosophy : Cicero and visions of humanity from Locke to Hume
First edition.
- 国立国会図書館請求記号
- HD5-D1
- 国立国会図書館書誌ID
- 029730615
- 資料種別
- 図書
- 著者
- Tim Stuart-Buttle.
- 出版者
- Oxford University Press
- 出版年
- 2019.
- 資料形態
- 紙
- ページ数・大きさ等
- x, 277 pages ; 24 cm
- NDC
- -
書店で探す
書店で探す
書誌情報
この資料の詳細や典拠(同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名)等を確認できます。
紙
- 資料種別
- 図書
- ISBN
- 0198835582 (hardback)9780198835585 (hardback)
- 著者・編者
- Tim Stuart-Buttle.
- 版
- First edition.
- 出版年月日等
- 2019.著作権日付 : ©2019
- 出版年(W3CDTF)
- 2019
- 数量
- x, 277 pages
- 大きさ
- 24 cm
- 出版地(国名コード)
- GB
- 本文の言語コード
- eng
- ジャンル・形式用語
- 表現種別
- text
- 機器種別
- unmediated
- キャリア種別
- volume
- 件名標目
- LCC
- DDC
- NDLC
- 対象利用者
- 一般
- 資料の内容に関する注記
- The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries represent a period of remarkable intellectual vitality in British philosophy, as figures such as Hobbes, Locke, Hume, and Smith attempted to explain the origins and sustaining mechanisms of civil society. Their insights continue to inform how political and moral theorists think about the world in which we live. From Moral Theology to Moral Philosophy reconstructs a debate which preoccupied contemporaries but which seems arcane to us today. It concerned the relationship between reason and revelation as the two sources of mankind's knowledge, particularly in the ethical realm: to what extent, they asked, could reason alone discover the content and obligatory character of morality? This was held to be a historical, rather than a merely theoretical question: had the philosophers of pre-Christian antiquity, ignorant of Christ, been able satisfactorily to explain the moral universe? What role had natural theology played in their ethical theories - and was it consistent with the teachings delivered by revelation? Much recent scholarship has drawn attention to the early-modern interest in two late Hellenistic philosophical traditions - Stoicism and Epicureanism. Yet in the English context, three figures above all - John Locke, Conyers Middleton, and David Hume - quite deliberately and explicitly identified their approaches with Cicero as the representative of an alternative philosophical tradition, critical of both the Stoic and the Epicurean: academic scepticism. All argued that Cicero provided a means of addressing what they considered to be the most pressing question facing contemporary philosophy: the relationship between moral philosophy and moral theology."--
- 書誌注記
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- 所蔵機関
- 国立国会図書館
- 請求記号
- HD5-D1
- 連携機関・データベース
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館蔵書
- 書誌ID(NDLBibID)
- 029730615
- LC control number
- 2019936251
- OCLC番号
- 1080873505
- 目録規則
- RDA
- 整理区分コード
- 211