Judicial review and strategic behaviour : an empirical case law analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court

• 資料種別: 図書
• ISBN: 9781780686943 hardcover; 1780686943 hardcover
• タイトル: Judicial review and strategic behaviour : an empirical case law analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court
• 著者・編者: Josephine De Jaegere.
• シリーズタイトル: Intersentia studies on courts and judges
• タイトル標目: Intersentia studies on courts and judges.
• 著者標目: De Jaegere, Josephine.
• 出版事項: Cambridge : Intersentia (出版); Antwerp : Intersentia (出版); Chicago : Intersentia (出版)
• 出版年月日等: [2019]; 著作権日付 : ©2019
• 出版年（W3CDTF）: 2019
• 数量: xiii, 365 pages
• 形態の詳細: illustrations
• 大きさ: 26 cm.
• 並列タイトル等: Judicial review and strategic behavior
• 出版地（国名コード）: GB
• 本文の言語コード: eng
• 表現種別: txt : text
• 機器種別: n : unmediated
• キャリア種別: nc : volume
• 件名標目: Belgium. Cour constitutionnelle.; Judicial review--Belgium.; Courts--Belgium.; Courts.; Judicial review.; Belgium.
• LCC: KJK2620
• DDC: 347.493012
• NDLC: AB4-211; A222
• 対象利用者: 一般
• 資料の内容に関する注記: Traditionally, legal scholarship on judicial review is predominantly normative, concentrating on how courts should decide cases and to what extent they should show deference towards the legislative branch. Political scientists, on the other hand, seem more interested in what motivates judges and which factors influence their decisions. In contrast to the extensive body of literature on judicial behaviour in countries with a common law tradition (especially on the US Supreme Court), there is little systematic, empirical knowledge relating to European constitutional courts. Given the constitutional courts' function in liberal democracies, this is surprising. Focusing on the Constitutional Court of Belgium, the approach of this book is to combine normative ideas on how the Court should act with an empirical case law analysis. It explores the extent to which the Court performs as a deliberative institution, while operating within a consensual political system: Does the Court employ deliberative 'judicial good practices'? Is the Court's performance affected by strategic considerations? And if the Court's rulings reflect strategic actions, does this behaviour correspond to the deliberative expectations weighing on the Court? The answers to these questions contribute to a fundamental discussion about the appropriate role for judicial institutions in a democratic society. The book shows that the Court's case law is (in part) shaped by strategic considerations. In salient cases, the Court prudently adapts various aspects of its decision in order to stimulate acceptance and compliance.
• 書誌注記: Includes bibliographical references (pages 345-359) and index.
• 所蔵機関: 国立国会図書館
• 請求記号: AB4-211-D1
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館蔵書; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 029735822; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/029735822
• OCLC番号: 1090687952; https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1090687952
• 目録規則: RDA
• 整理区分コード: 211

• 内容細目: Part I. Normative framework : the deliberative performance of constitutional courtsConstitutional review in democratic systems : countering the counte...