From Plato to Platonism

• 資料種別: 図書
• ISBN: 9780801452413 (cloth ; alk. paper); 0801452414 (cloth ; alk. paper)
• ISBN（エラーコード）: 9780801469176 (ebook)
• タイトル: From Plato to Platonism
• 著者・編者: Lloyd P. Gerson
• 著者標目: Gerson, Lloyd P.
• 出版事項: Ithaca : Cornell University Press (出版)
• 出版年月日等: 2013
• 出版年（W3CDTF）: 2013
• 数量: x, 345 pages
• 大きさ: 24 cm
• 出版地（国名コード）: US
• 本文の言語コード: eng
• 表現種別: text
• 機器種別: unmediated
• キャリア種別: volume
• 件名標目: Plato; Plato, 428-348 v.Chr; Plato.; Plato v427-v347; Plotinus 205-270; Platonists; 08.21 Ancient philosophy; Platonists.; Platonismus; Platonism.
• LCC: B395
• DDC: 184
• NDLC: HC14
• 対象利用者: 一般
• 資料の内容に関する注記: Gerson contends that the philosophical position of Plato—Plato’s own Platonism, so to speak—was produced out of a matrix he calls “Ur-Platonism.” According to Gerson, Ur-Platonism is the conjunction of five 'antis' that in total arrive at anti-naturalism: anti-nominalism, anti-mechanism, anti-materialism, anti-relativism, and anti-skepticism. Plato’s Platonism is an attempt to construct the most consistent and defensible positive system uniting the five 'antis.' It is also the system that all later Platonists throughout Antiquity attributed to Plato when countering attacks from critics including Peripatetics, Stoics, and Sceptics. In conclusion, Gerson shows that Late Antique philosophers such as Proclus were right in regarding Plotinus as 'the great exegete of the Platonic revelation.'"--
• 書誌注記: Includes bibliographical references and indexes
• 所蔵機関: 国立国会図書館
• 請求記号: HC14-D3
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館蔵書; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 030171508; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/030171508
• LC control number: 2013010926; https://lccn.loc.gov/2013010926
• OCLC番号: 833147102; https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/833147102
• 目録規則: RDA
• 整理区分コード: 211

• 内容細目: Plato and his readers: Was Plato a Platonist? ; Socrates and Platonism ; Reading the dialogues platonically ; Aristotle on Plato and PlatonismThe cont...
• 要約等: "Was Plato a Platonist? While ancient disciples of Plato would have answered this question in the affirmative, modern scholars have generally denied t...