Validation of a global scale to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork in mental health settings

• Material Type: 博士論文
• Title: Validation of a global scale to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork in mental health settings
• Author/Editor: Tomizawa, Ryoko; Yamano, Mayumi; Osako, Mitue; Hirabayashi, Naotugu; Ohshima, Nobuo; Shigeta, Masahiro; Reeves, Scott; トミザワ, リョウコ; ヤマノ, マユミ; オオサコ, ミツエ; ヒラバヤシ, ナオツグ; オオシマ, ノブオ; シゲタ, マサヒロ; 冨澤, 涼子
• Author Heading: Tomizawa, Ryoko; Yamano, Mayumi; Osako, Mitue; Hirabayashi, Naotugu; Ohshima, Nobuo; Shigeta, Masahiro; Reeves, Scott; トミザワ, リョウコ; ヤマノ, マユミ; オオサコ, ミツエ; ヒラバヤシ, ナオツグ; オオシマ, ノブオ; シゲタ, マサヒロ; 冨澤, 涼子
• Publication Date: 2017-03-25
• Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2017-03-25
• Alternative Title: 精神科における多職種チーム医療の質を測定する尺度の開発
• Pages: 1-32
• Degree grantor/type: 首都大学東京
• Date Granted: 2017-03-25
• Dissertation Number: 乙第146号
• Degree Type: 博士（作業療法学）
• Text Language Code: eng
• Subject Heading: interprofessional collaboration; teamwork; psychiatry; quantitative evaluation; cross-cultural comparisons
• NDLC: UT51
• Target Audience: 一般
• Note (General): Background: Few scales currently exist to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork through team members’ perceptions of working together in mental health settings. Aims: The purpose of this study was to revise and validate an interprofessional scale to assess the quality of teamwork in inpatient psychiatric units and to use it multi-nationally. Methods: A literature review was undertaken to identify evaluative teamwork tools and develop an additional 12 items to ensure a broad global focus. Focus group discussions considered adaptation to different care systems using subjective judgements from 11 participants in a pre-test of items. Data quality, construct validity, reproducibility, and internal consistency were investigated in the survey using an international comparative design. Results: Exploratory factor analysis yielded five factors with 21 items: ‘patient/community centred care’, ‘collaborative communication’, ‘interprofessional conflict’, ‘role clarification’, and ‘environment’. High overall internal consistency, reproducibility, adequate face validity, and reasonable construct validity were shown in the USA and Japan. Conclusions: The revised Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) is a valid measure to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork in psychiatry and identifies the best strategies to improve team performance. Furthermore, the revised scale will generate more rigorous evidence for collaborative practice in psychiatry internationally.; 首都大学東京, 2017-03-25, 博士（作業療法学）, 乙第146号
• Access Restrictions: インターネット公開
• Related Material: http://hdl.handle.net/10748/00009644; http://hdl.handle.net/10748/00009645; 副論文「Framework development for the assessment of interprofessional teamwork in mental health settings」『Journal of interprofessional care』 31(1), 43-50, 2017-01は別途登録 (http://hdl.handle.net/10748/00009644); 副論文「The development and validation of an interprofessional scale to assess teamwork in mental health settings」『Journal of interprofessional care』 28(5), 485-486, 2014-09は別途登録 (http://hdl.handle.net/10748/00009645)
• Data Provider (Database): 国立情報学研究所 : 学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）; https://irdb.nii.ac.jp
• Original Data Provider (Database): 東京都立大学 : みやこ鳥

Table of Contents

https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=6239&item_no=1&attribute_id=18&file_no=1 fulltext

https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=6239&item_no=1&attribute_id=18&file_no=2 fulltext

https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=6239&item_no=1&attribute_id=18&file_no=3 fulltext