How do “Emerging” Donors Differ from “Traditional” Donors?

Material type: 文書・図像類

Author: Sato, Jinほか

Publisher: -

Publication date: 2010-03-01

Material Format: Digital

Capacity, size, etc.: -

NDC: -

View All

Notes on use

Note (General)：: Debate about the role and impact of the so-called “emerging donors” is becoming increasingly heated. The common reaction to these new donors, distinct...

Search by Bookstore

Holdings of Libraries in Japan

This page shows libraries in Japan other than the National Diet Library that hold the material.

List of Cooperating Institutions and Databases

Please contact your local library for information on how to use materials or whether it is possible to request materials from the holding libraries.

other

JICA Research Institute Repository
Digital
You can check the holdings of institutions and databases with which Institutional Repositories DataBase(IRDB)(Institutional Repository) is linked at the site of Institutional Repositories DataBase(IRDB)(Institutional Repository).
JICA Research Institute Repository

Search by Bookstore

Bibliographic Record

You can check the details of this material, its authority (keywords that refer to materials on the same subject, author's name, etc.), etc.

Digital

Material Type: 文書・図像類
Title: How do “Emerging” Donors Differ from “Traditional” Donors?
Author/Editor: Sato, Jin
Shiga, Hiroaki
Kobayashi, Takaaki
Kondoh, Hisahiro
Author Heading: Sato, Jin
Shiga, Hiroaki
Kobayashi, Takaaki
Kondoh, Hisahiro
Publication Date: 2010-03-01
Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2010-03-01
Alternative Title: An Institutional Analysis of Foreign Aid in Cambodia
No. or year of volume/issue: Working Paper;2
Volume: Working Paper;2
Text Language Code: eng
Subject Heading: emerging donors
Cambodia
harmonization
aid fragmentation
institution
Target Audience: 一般
Note (General): Debate about the role and impact of the so-called “emerging donors” is becoming increasingly heated. The common reaction to these new donors, distinct from that accorded traditional donors, has had the unfortunate effect of obscuring two important aspects of the evolving aid landscape: 1) commonalities between the emerging donors and traditional Development Assistance Committee (DAC) donors; and 2) an evident diversity among the emerging donors. The biases at play are derived not only from a lack of sufficient information about how these new donors operate on the ground, but also from a lack of effort to integrate and analyze information that is available. This paper examines the impact of four emerging donors — China, India, the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “Korea”), and Thailand — on Cambodia‟s development, with a specific focus on the processes of aid provision by these new donors. By accounting for the experiences of the recipient country, this paper also challenges the conventional view that aid fragmentation should be reduced a priori.
DOI: 10.18884/00000602
Access Restrictions: 限定公開
Data Provider (Database): 国立情報学研究所 : 学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）
https://irdb.nii.ac.jp
Original Data Provider (Database): 独立行政法人国際協力機構 : JICA RI リポジトリ