関係詞thatとwhichに関しての一考察 : 主格用法における相違点を求めて

Material type: 文書・図像類

Author: 堀内, 俊和

Publisher: 愛知工業大学

Publication date: 1971-03-30

Material Format: Digital

Capacity, size, etc.: -

NDC: -

View All

Notes on use

Note (General)：: Although a number of things have been said about the relatives that and which, yet there seem to be some questionable points left to be answered. So s...

Search by Bookstore

Holdings of Libraries in Japan

This page shows libraries in Japan other than the National Diet Library that hold the material.

List of Cooperating Institutions and Databases

Please contact your local library for information on how to use materials or whether it is possible to request materials from the holding libraries.

other

AIT Associated Repository of Academic Resources
Digital
You can check the holdings of institutions and databases with which Institutional Repositories DataBase(IRDB)(Institutional Repository) is linked at the site of Institutional Repositories DataBase(IRDB)(Institutional Repository).
AIT Associated Repository of Academic Resources

Search by Bookstore

Bibliographic Record

You can check the details of this material, its authority (keywords that refer to materials on the same subject, author's name, etc.), etc.

Digital

Material Type: 文書・図像類
Title: 関係詞thatとwhichに関しての一考察 : 主格用法における相違点を求めて
Author/Editor: 堀内, 俊和
Author Heading: 堀内, 俊和
Publication, Distribution, etc.: 愛知工業大学
Publication Date: 1971-03-30
Publication Date (W3CDTF): 1971-03-30
Alternative Title: カンケイシ that ト which ニカンシテノイチコウサツ : シュカクヨウホウニオケルソウイテンオモトメテ
AN INQUIRY INTO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RELATIVES THAT & WHICH
Periodical title: 愛知工業大学研究報告 = Bulletin of Aichi Institute of Technology
No. or year of volume/issue: 6
Volume: 6
Pages: 51-58
Text Language Code: jpn
Target Audience: 一般
Note (General): Although a number of things have been said about the relatives that and which, yet there seem to be some questionable points left to be answered. So some investigations and considerations are made of all the specimens of the two relatives IN SUBJECTIVE CASE, from ten books (chiefly American novels) published after 1940. The results are as follows. Functionally and in psychological effects, that is more conjunctional than pronominal and connects the antecedent with the clause introduced by it, more closely than which. The content of the clause seems to be mostly ordinary and plain enough. As which is stronger both phonetically and semantically, the clause introduced by it seems to attract much greater attention than thai-clause. So, when the relative clause deals with what the writer thinks is important or fairly new, which is more effective than that. Hence more which-clauses in scholastic writings. Statistically, in restrictive use, that is usually in higher frequency and more general use than which.
identifier:http://repository.aitech.ac.jp/dspace/handle/11133/256
Access Restrictions: 限定公開
Periodical Title (NCID): AN00007787
https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/AN00007787
Data Provider (Database): 国立情報学研究所 : 学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）
https://irdb.nii.ac.jp
Original Data Provider (Database): 愛知工業大学 : 愛知工業大学学術情報リポジトリ