青色LED判決における特許法35条の規定する相当対価の算定

Material type: 文書・図像類

Author: 岡崎, 一浩

Publisher: 愛知工業大学

Publication date: 2004-03-31

Material Format: Digital

Capacity, size, etc.: -

NDC: -

View All

Notes on use

Note (General)：: The Tokyo District Court awarded to Prof. Shuji Nakamura 20 billion yen for the reasonable remuneration of the blue LED patent which was deemed to hav...

Search by Bookstore

Holdings of Libraries in Japan

This page shows libraries in Japan other than the National Diet Library that hold the material.

List of Cooperating Institutions and Databases

Please contact your local library for information on how to use materials or whether it is possible to request materials from the holding libraries.

other

AIT Associated Repository of Academic Resources
Digital
You can check the holdings of institutions and databases with which Institutional Repositories DataBase(IRDB)(Institutional Repository) is linked at the site of Institutional Repositories DataBase(IRDB)(Institutional Repository).
AIT Associated Repository of Academic Resources

Search by Bookstore

Bibliographic Record

You can check the details of this material, its authority (keywords that refer to materials on the same subject, author's name, etc.), etc.

Digital

Material Type: 文書・図像類
Title: 青色LED判決における特許法35条の規定する相当対価の算定
Author/Editor: 岡崎, 一浩
Author Heading: 岡崎, 一浩
Publication, Distribution, etc.: 愛知工業大学
Publication Date: 2004-03-31
Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2004-03-31
Alternative Title: Amount of Reasonable Remuneration under Section 35 of the Patent Law for Nichia Corporation v. Shuji Nakamura
Periodical title: 愛知工業大学研究報告. B, 専門関係論文集 = Bulletin of Aichi Institute of Technology. Part B
No. or year of volume/issue: 39
Volume: 39
Pages: 131-139
ISSN (Periodical Title): ISSN : 0387-0812
Text Language Code: jpn
Target Audience: 一般
Note (General): The Tokyo District Court awarded to Prof. Shuji Nakamura 20 billion yen for the reasonable remuneration of the blue LED patent which was deemed to have been sold to Nichia Corporation under Section 35 of the Patent Law. Three accounting offices, namely Tohmatsu (internationally known as Deloitte Touche), Shin-nihon (Ernst & Young) and joint reporting by Venture-lab and ASG (Grant Thornton), submitted three completely different assessment reports. Although the court ruling was partly based on the Venture-lab and ASG, the awarded amount was somewhat the average among the three submitted amounts. This paper compares the methodology adopted by the court and the accounting offices, and accordingly clarifies the possible outcomes for future court rulings.
identifier:http://repository.aitech.ac.jp/dspace/handle/11133/1226
Access Restrictions: 限定公開
Periodical Title (NCID): AN00007801
https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/AN00007801
Data Provider (Database): 国立情報学研究所 : 学術機関リポジトリデータベース（IRDB）（機関リポジトリ）
https://irdb.nii.ac.jp
Original Data Provider (Database): 愛知工業大学 : 愛知工業大学学術情報リポジトリ