The other Australia/Japan living marine resources dispute : inferences on the merits of the southern bluefin tuna arbitration in light of the whaling case

• Material Type: 図書
• ISBN: 9789004339446 (paperback); 9004339442 (paperback)
• Title: The other Australia/Japan living marine resources dispute : inferences on the merits of the southern bluefin tuna arbitration in light of the whaling case
• Author/Editor: by Andrew Serdy.
• Series Title: Brill research perspectives
• Title Heading: Brill research perspectives.
• Author Heading: Serdy, Andrew.
• Publication, Distribution, etc.: Leiden : Brill (出版); Boston : Brill (出版)
• Publication Date: [2017]; 著作権日付 : ©2017
• Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2017
• Extent: vi, 91 pages
• Other physical details: illustrations
• Size: 24 cm.
• Place of Publication (Country Code): NL
• Text Language Code: eng
• Content Type: text
• Media Type: unmediated
• Carrier Type: volume
• Subject Heading: Law of the sea.; Marine resources conservation--Law and legislation--Japan.; Marine resources conservation--Law and legislation--Australia.; Marine resources conservation--Law and legislation--New Zealand.; Arbitration and award--Japan.; Arbitration and award--Australia.; Arbitration and award--New Zealand.; Bluefin tuna--Conservation--Law and legislation.; Marine resources.; Australia.; Japan.; Thunfisch; Walfang; Seerecht; Umweltschutz; Australien
• LCC: K3485
• DDC: 343.07692
• NDLC: A172
• Target Audience: 一般
• Note (Content): In 2000, the case brought by Australia and New Zealand against Japan's unilateral experimental fishing programme for southern bluefin tuna controversially failed to reach the merits for lack of the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction. It was widely supposed that it would ultimately have failed anyway because of international courts' reluctance to consider scientific matters, the dispute's underlying cause being the parties' scientific disagreements regarding both the tuna stock itself and the nature and risks of the experiment. In 2014, however, the ICJ decided in Australia's favour the case against Japan's scientific whaling, based on flaws in the design of that experiment. Reviewing the tuna experiment's evolving design, the propositions it was to (dis)prove and the use Japan intended for that proof, Andrew Serdy suggests that similar factors were at play in both disputes and that a similar outcome of the tuna case, though not inevitable, would have been amply justified --
• Note (Bibliography): Includes bibliographical references.
• Collection (particular): 日本関係外国語図書
• Holding library: 国立国会図書館
• Call No.: A172-B118
• Data Provider (Database): 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館蔵書; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• Bibliographic ID (NDL): 027966593; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/027966593
• LC Control Number: 2016956955; https://lccn.loc.gov/2016956955
• OCLC No.: 974936007; https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/974936007
• Cataloging Rule: RDA
• Bibliographic Record Category (NDL): 211

• Contents: The shaling case judgmentSouthern bluefin : the fishHistorical overview of the Japanese SBT fishery...