Why America loses wars : limited war and US strategy from the Korean War to the present

• Material Type: 図書
• ISBN: 1108479596 (hardcover); 9781108479592 (hardcover)
• ISBN (error code): 9781108608190 (PDF ebook)
• Title: Why America loses wars : limited war and US strategy from the Korean War to the present
• Author/Editor: Donald Stoker.
• Author Heading: Stoker, Donald J.
• Publication, Distribution, etc.: Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press (出版); New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press (出版)
• Publication Date: 2019.
• Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2019
• Extent: 331 pages
• Size: 24 cm
• Place of Publication (Country Code): GB
• Text Language Code: eng
• Genre/Form Terms: History.
• Content Type: txt : text
• Media Type: n : unmediated
• Carrier Type: nc : volume
• Subject Heading: Strategy--History--20th century.; Strategy--History--21st century.; Strategic culture--United States--History.; Military planning--United States.; United States--Military policy--20th century.; United States--Military policy--21st century.; United States--Foreign relations.; Politics and war--United States.; Diplomatic relations.; Military policy.; Strategy.; United States.
• LCC: U162
• DDC: 355.033073
• NDLC: AU-651; A656
• Target Audience: 一般
• Note (Bibliography): Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Holding library: 国立国会図書館
• Call No.: AU-651-D8
• Data Provider (Database): 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館蔵書; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• Bibliographic ID (NDL): 029738772; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/029738772
• LC Control Number: 2019396996; https://lccn.loc.gov/2019396996
• OCLC No.: 1076809983; https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1076809983
• Cataloging Rule: RDA
• Bibliographic Record Category (NDL): 211

• Contents: Are we at war? What do we want? And do we want to win?The way we think about war (particularly limited war) is broken: here is how we fix itThe politi...
• Summary, etc.: "How can you achieve victory in war if you don't have a clear idea of your political objectives and a vision of what victory means? In this provocativ...