Debating the A Priori First edition

Debating the A Priori

First edition

Call No. (NDL): H21-D8
Bibliographic ID of National Diet Library: 030391891

Material type: 図書

Author: Paul Boghossian and Timothy Williamson

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Publication date: 2020

Material Format: Paper

Capacity, size, etc.: xi, 259 pages ; 24 cm

NDC: -

View All

Search by Bookstore

Holdings of Libraries in Japan

This page shows libraries in Japan other than the National Diet Library that hold the material.

List of Cooperating Institutions and Databases

Please contact your local library for information on how to use materials or whether it is possible to request materials from the holding libraries.

other

CiNii Research
Search Service
Paper
You can check the holdings of institutions and databases with which CiNii Research is linked at the site of CiNii Research.
Check the holdings of this book

Search by Bookstore

Bibliographic Record

You can check the details of this material, its authority (keywords that refer to materials on the same subject, author's name, etc.), etc.

Paper

Material Type: 図書
ISBN: 9780198851707 hardcover
0198851707 hardcover
Title: Debating the A Priori
Author/Editor: Paul Boghossian and Timothy Williamson
Edition: First edition
Author Heading: Boghossian, Paul A. (Paul Artin), 1957- ( 031890208 )Authorities
Williamson, Timothy
Publication, Distribution, etc.: Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press (出版)
Publication Date: 2020
Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2020
Extent: xi, 259 pages
Size: 24 cm
Place of Publication (Country Code): GB
Text Language Code: eng
Content Type: text
Media Type: unmediated
Carrier Type: volume
Subject Heading: A priori
Intuition
Inference
Comprehension
A priori.
Comprehension.
Inference.
Intuition.
LCC: BD181.3
DDC: 121/.3
NDLC: H21
Target Audience: 一般
Note (Content): What kind of knowledge could be obtainable just by thinking? Debating the A Priori presents a series of exchanges between two leading philosophers on how to answer this question. In this extended debate, Boghossian and Williamson contribute alternating chapters which develop radically contrasting views and present detailed replies to each other's arguments. A central case is the nature of basic logical knowledge and the justification for basic deductive inferences, but the arguments range widely across epistemology, the philosophy of language, and metaphilosophy. The debate takes in the status of the distinctions between analytic and synthetic and between a priori and a posteriori, as well as problems concerning the conditions for linguistic understanding and competence, and the question of what it might be to grasp a concept or to have an intuition. Both authors explore implications for how philosophy itself works, or should work. The result vividly exposes some of the main fault lines in contemporary philosophy, concerning the relation between reason and experience, the status of basic beliefs, the nature of concepts and intuitions, the role of language in our understanding of the world, how to study knowledge, and what it is to do philosophy.0Both authors provide conclusions which sum up their positions and place the arguments in context. Their lively and engaging exchanges allow the reader to follow up-close how a philosophical debatte evolves
Note (Bibliography): Includes bibliographical references and index
Holding library: 国立国会図書館
Call No.: H21-D8
Data Provider (Database): 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館蔵書
https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
Bibliographic ID (NDL): 030391891
http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/030391891
LC Control Number: 2019954837
https://lccn.loc.gov/2019954837
OCLC No.: 1136964615
https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1136964615
Cataloging Rule: RDA
Bibliographic Record Category (NDL): 211