釣漁業における餌料の研究-3-マアジの餌料選択性,ならびに魚群の餌付きにおよぼすソーメン投餌の影響

• 資料種別: 記事
• タイトル: 釣漁業における餌料の研究-3-マアジの餌料選択性,ならびに魚群の餌付きにおよぼすソーメン投餌の影響
• 著者・編者: 岡林 正十郎
• 著者標目: 岡林 正十郎
• タイトル（掲載誌）: 日本水産学会誌 / 日本水産学会 編
• 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）: 32(8) 1966.08
• 掲載巻: 32
• 掲載号: 8
• 掲載ページ: 623～629
• 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）: 1966-08
• ISSN（掲載誌）: 0021-5392
• ISSN-L（掲載誌）: 0021-5392
• 出版事項（掲載誌）: 東京 : 日本水産学会
• 出版地（国名コード）: JP
• 本文の言語コード: jpn
• NDLC: ZR26
• 対象利用者: 一般
• 所蔵機関: 国立国会図書館
• 請求記号: Z18-345
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 8391663; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/8391663
• 整理区分コード: 632

• 要約等: In order to investigate the fooding habit of jack mackerel, <i>Trachurus trachurus</i> (Linné), the fish were confined in floating fish preserves for a month, during which anchovy larvae, skipjack muscle and vermicelli were given as food. The results of the feeding are as follows.<br> 1) Anchovy larvae and skipjack muscle were eaten very well, while the fish did not take vermicelli, either boiled or unboiled, when it was given singly. However, boiled vermicelli mixed with anchovy larvae or skipjack muscle was eaten by about half of the fish which showed feeding (Table 2 and 3).<br> 2) Even after vermicelli had been given intermittently, the fish took the other foods well. Therefore, it does not seem likely that vermicelli has an unfavorable effect on feeding of the fish.
• DOI: 10.2331/suisan.32.623
• オンライン閲覧公開範囲: インターネット公開
• 連携機関・データベース: 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE; http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp

• 要約等: In order to investigate the fooding habit of jack mackerel, <i>Trachurus trachurus</i> (Linné), the fish were confined in floating fish preserves for a month, during which anchovy larvae, skipjack muscle and vermicelli were given as food. The results of the feeding are as follows.<br> 1) Anchovy larvae and skipjack muscle were eaten very well, while the fish did not take vermicelli, either boiled or unboiled, when it was given singly. However, boiled vermicelli mixed with anchovy larvae or skipjack muscle was eaten by about half of the fish which showed feeding (Table 2 and 3).<br> 2) Even after vermicelli had been given intermittently, the fish took the other foods well. Therefore, it does not seem likely that vermicelli has an unfavorable effect on feeding of the fish.
• DOI: 10.2331/suisan.32.623; https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.32.623
• 関連情報（URI）: http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/8391663; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I8391663
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research; https://cir.nii.ac.jp/
• 提供元機関・データベース: Japan Link Center; https://japanlinkcenter.org/top; 雑誌記事索引データベース; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp; Crossref; https://www.crossref.org; CiNii Articles
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 8391663; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/8391663
• NII論文ID: 130000913449