アレン・カールソンの自然鑑賞理論における美的性質 : カテゴリーのはたらきに注目して

• 資料種別: 記事
• タイトル: アレン・カールソンの自然鑑賞理論における美的性質 : カテゴリーのはたらきに注目して
• 著者・編者: 青田 麻未
• 著者標目: 青田 麻未
• 並列タイトル等: Aesthetic Properties in Allen Carlson's Theory for the Appreciation of Nature : Focusing on the Functions of Categories
• タイトル（掲載誌）: 美学 = Aesthetics / 美学会 編
• 巻号年月日等（掲載誌）: 66(1)=246:2015.夏
• 掲載巻: 66
• 掲載号: 1
• 掲載通号: 246
• 掲載ページ: 89-100
• 掲載年月日（W3CDTF）: 2015
• ISSN（掲載誌）: 0520-0962
• ISSN-L（掲載誌）: 0520-0962
• 出版事項（掲載誌）: 東京 : 美学会 ; 1950-
• 出版地（国名コード）: JP
• 本文の言語コード: jpn
• NDLC: ZK1
• 対象利用者: 一般
• 所蔵機関: 国立国会図書館
• 請求記号: Z11-34
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 026612413; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/026612413
• 整理区分コード: 632

• 要約等: In this paper I will present one interpretation of Allen Carlson's theory for aesthetic appreciation of nature. Carlson claims that we must know commonsense/scientific categories of nature for appropriate aesthetic appreciation of it. There are two intentions behind his statement: one is to make an objective theory for the judgment of nature and the other is to advocate for the assertions of environmentalists on pristine nature. According to these intentions I think Carlson assigns two different roles to those categories, and consequently he assigns two different kinds of aesthetic properties for the same nature through those categories. First, those categories can function to determine the focus of aesthetic appreciation of nature. Here Carlson depends on Kendall Walton's theory of categories of art and applies it to aesthetic appreciation of nature. In this case categories reveal some aesthetic properties that depend on non- aesthetic (physical) properties of nature. Second, categories can function to show the positions of objects in natural order. Through this function categories reveal aesthetic properties that objects can have in relation to natural order. Finally I will point out the difference and similarity of those two aesthetic properties and show the limit of Carlson's view.
• DOI: 10.20631/bigaku.66.1_89
• オンライン閲覧公開範囲: インターネット公開
• 連携機関・データベース: 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE; http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp

• 要約等: In this paper I will present one interpretation of Allen Carlson's theory for aesthetic appreciation of nature. Carlson claims that we must know commonsense/scientific categories of nature for appropriate aesthetic appreciation of it. There are two intentions behind his statement: one is to make an objective theory for the judgment of nature and the other is to advocate for the assertions of environmentalists on pristine nature. According to these intentions I think Carlson assigns two different roles to those categories, and consequently he assigns two different kinds of aesthetic properties for the same nature through those categories. First, those categories can function to determine the focus of aesthetic appreciation of nature. Here Carlson depends on Kendall Walton's theory of categories of art and applies it to aesthetic appreciation of nature. In this case categories reveal some aesthetic properties that depend on non- aesthetic (physical) properties of nature. Second, categories can function to show the positions of objects in natural order. Through this function categories reveal aesthetic properties that objects can have in relation to natural order. Finally I will point out the difference and similarity of those two aesthetic properties and show the limit of Carlson's view.
• DOI: 10.20631/bigaku.66.1_89; https://doi.org/10.20631/bigaku.66.1_89
• 関連情報（URI）: http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/026612413; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I026612413
• 連携機関・データベース: 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research; https://cir.nii.ac.jp/
• 提供元機関・データベース: Japan Link Center; https://japanlinkcenter.org/top; 雑誌記事索引データベース; https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp; CiNii Articles
• 書誌ID（NDLBibID）: 026612413; http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/026612413
• NII論文ID: 110009976467