アレン・カールソンの自然鑑賞理論における美的性質 : カテゴリーのはたらきに注目して
Digital data available（科学技術振興機構）
Begin reading now
J-STAGE
Holdings of Libraries in Japan
This page shows libraries in Japan other than the National Diet Library that hold the material.
Please contact your local library for information on how to use materials or whether it is possible to request materials from the holding libraries.
other
J-STAGE
DigitalCiNii Research
Search ServiceDigitalYou can check the holdings of institutions and databases with which CiNii Research is linked at the site of CiNii Research.
Bibliographic Record
You can check the details of this material, its authority (keywords that refer to materials on the same subject, author's name, etc.), etc.
- Material Type
- 記事
- Author/Editor
- 青田 麻未
- Author Heading
- Alternative Title
- Aesthetic Properties in Allen Carlson's Theory for the Appreciation of Nature : Focusing on the Functions of Categories
- Periodical title
- 美学 = Aesthetics / 美学会 編
- No. or year of volume/issue
- 66(1)=246:2015.夏
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Sequential issue number
- 246
- Pages
- 89-100
- Publication date of volume/issue (W3CDTF)
- 2015
- ISSN (Periodical Title)
- 0520-0962
- ISSN-L (Periodical Title)
- 0520-0962
- Publication (Periodical Title)
- 東京 : 美学会 ; 1950-
- Place of Publication (Country Code)
- JP
- Text Language Code
- jpn
- NDLC
- Target Audience
- 一般
- Holding library
- 国立国会図書館
- Call No.
- Z11-34
- Data Provider (Database)
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館雑誌記事索引
- Bibliographic ID (NDL)
- 026612413
- Bibliographic Record Category (NDL)
- 632
- Summary, etc.
- In this paper I will present one interpretation of Allen Carlson's theory for aesthetic appreciation of nature. Carlson claims that we must know commonsense/scientific categories of nature for appropriate aesthetic appreciation of it. There are two intentions behind his statement: one is to make an objective theory for the judgment of nature and the other is to advocate for the assertions of environmentalists on pristine nature. According to these intentions I think Carlson assigns two different roles to those categories, and consequently he assigns two different kinds of aesthetic properties for the same nature through those categories. First, those categories can function to determine the focus of aesthetic appreciation of nature. Here Carlson depends on Kendall Walton's theory of categories of art and applies it to aesthetic appreciation of nature. In this case categories reveal some aesthetic properties that depend on non- aesthetic (physical) properties of nature. Second, categories can function to show the positions of objects in natural order. Through this function categories reveal aesthetic properties that objects can have in relation to natural order. Finally I will point out the difference and similarity of those two aesthetic properties and show the limit of Carlson's view.
- DOI
- 10.20631/bigaku.66.1_89
- Access Restrictions
- インターネット公開
- Data Provider (Database)
- 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE
- Summary, etc.
- In this paper I will present one interpretation of Allen Carlson's theory for aesthetic appreciation of nature. Carlson claims that we must know commonsense/scientific categories of nature for appropriate aesthetic appreciation of it. There are two intentions behind his statement: one is to make an objective theory for the judgment of nature and the other is to advocate for the assertions of environmentalists on pristine nature. According to these intentions I think Carlson assigns two different roles to those categories, and consequently he assigns two different kinds of aesthetic properties for the same nature through those categories. First, those categories can function to determine the focus of aesthetic appreciation of nature. Here Carlson depends on Kendall Walton's theory of categories of art and applies it to aesthetic appreciation of nature. In this case categories reveal some aesthetic properties that depend on non- aesthetic (physical) properties of nature. Second, categories can function to show the positions of objects in natural order. Through this function categories reveal aesthetic properties that objects can have in relation to natural order. Finally I will point out the difference and similarity of those two aesthetic properties and show the limit of Carlson's view.
- DOI
- 10.20631/bigaku.66.1_89
- Related Material (URI)
- Data Provider (Database)
- 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
- Original Data Provider (Database)
- Japan Link Center雑誌記事索引データベースCiNii Articles
- Bibliographic ID (NDL)
- 026612413
- NAID
- 110009976467