本文へ移動
電子書籍・電子雑誌JMA Journal
巻号7 (2)
Conclusive...

Conclusiveness of Cochrane reviews on nursing interventions for patients with cancer : a systematic analysis

記事を表すアイコン
表紙は所蔵館によって異なることがあります ヘルプページへのリンク

Conclusiveness of Cochrane reviews on nursing interventions for patients with cancer : a systematic analysis

国立国会図書館永続的識別子
info:ndljp/pid/14495112
資料種別
記事
著者
Jun Kakoほか
出版者
Japan Medical Association
出版年
2024-04-15
資料形態
デジタル
掲載誌名
JMA Journal 7(2)
掲載ページ
-
詳細を見る

資料詳細

要約等:

<p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in oncology nursing.</p><p><b>Methods</b>: We searched s...

全国の図書館の所蔵

国立国会図書館以外の全国の図書館の所蔵状況を表示します。

所蔵のある図書館から取寄せることが可能かなど、資料の利用方法は、ご自身が利用されるお近くの図書館へご相談ください

その他

書誌情報

この資料の詳細や典拠(同じ主題の資料を指すキーワード、著者名)等を確認できます。

デジタル

資料種別
記事
著者・編者
Jun Kako
Masamitsu Kobayashi
Kohei Kajiwara
Yoshiyasu Ito
Michihiro Tsubaki
Takahiro Kakeda
出版年月日等
2024-04-15
出版年(W3CDTF)
2024-04-15
タイトル(掲載誌)
JMA Journal
巻号年月日等(掲載誌)
7(2)
掲載巻
7(2)
ISSN(掲載誌)
2433-3298
ISSN-L(掲載誌)
2433-328X
本文の言語コード
eng
国立国会図書館永続的識別子
info:ndljp/pid/14495112
コレクション(共通)
コレクション(障害者向け資料:レベル1)
コレクション(個別)
国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > 電子書籍・電子雑誌 > その他
収集根拠
インターネット資料収集保存事業(WARP)
受理日(W3CDTF)
2025-10-21T09:04:40+09:00
保存日(W3CDTF)
2024-09-26
記録形式(IMT)
application/pdf
オンライン閲覧公開範囲
インターネット公開
遠隔複写可否(NDL)
不可
掲載誌(国立国会図書館永続的識別子)
info:ndljp/pid/14495108
連携機関・データベース
国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション

デジタル

要約等
<p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in oncology nursing.</p><p><b>Methods</b>: We searched systematically for all CRs published in the Cochrane Library in the oncology nursing field between January 2014 and April 2023. We analyzed the difference between conclusive and inconclusive outcomes using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests and identified 430 articles. However, we excluded 385 articles after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We assessed 45 full-text articles for eligibility and identified 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, we extracted 19 interventions.</p><p><b>Results</b>: The overall outcomes were 182 cases, with 51.6% (n = 94) and 48.4% (n = 88) demonstrating conclusiveness and inconclusiveness, respectively. Regarding conclusiveness, 28.0% (n = 51) and 23.6% (n = 43) reported that the studied interventions were effective and ineffective, respectively. We found that studies on interventions related to physical activity and yoga had significantly high rates of conclusive. Compared with inconclusiveness outcomes, conclusive outcomes involved significantly more studies (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusions</b>: Ultimately, these findings reveal that in the oncology nursing field, only 51% of the main outcomes of each nursing intervention in CRs were conclusive.</p>
DOI
10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181
オンライン閲覧公開範囲
インターネット公開
連携機関・データベース
科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE

デジタル

要約等
<p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in oncology nursing.</p><p><b>Methods</b>: We searched systematically for all CRs published in the Cochrane Library in the oncology nursing field between January 2014 and April 2023. We analyzed the difference between conclusive and inconclusive outcomes using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests and identified 430 articles. However, we excluded 385 articles after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We assessed 45 full-text articles for eligibility and identified 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, we extracted 19 interventions.</p><p><b>Results</b>: The overall outcomes were 182 cases, with 51.6% (n = 94) and 48.4% (n = 88) demonstrating conclusiveness and inconclusiveness, respectively. Regarding conclusiveness, 28.0% (n = 51) and 23.6% (n = 43) reported that the studied interventions were effective and ineffective, respectively. We found that studies on interventions related to physical activity and yoga had significantly high rates of conclusive. Compared with inconclusiveness outcomes, conclusive outcomes involved significantly more studies (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusions</b>: Ultimately, these findings reveal that in the oncology nursing field, only 51% of the main outcomes of each nursing intervention in CRs were conclusive.</p>
オンライン閲覧公開範囲
インターネット公開
連携機関・データベース
国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
提供元機関・データベース
Japan Link Center
雑誌記事索引データベース
Crossref
書誌ID(NDLBibID)
14495112