Conclusiveness of Cochrane reviews on nursing interventions for patients with cancer : a systematic analysis
Read via the Internet
Begin reading now
NDL Digital Collections
Digital data available
Check on the publisher's website
DOI[10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181]to the data of the same series
Holdings of Libraries in Japan
This page shows libraries in Japan other than the National Diet Library that hold the material.
Please contact your local library for information on how to use materials or whether it is possible to request materials from the holding libraries.
other
J-STAGE
DigitalCiNii Research
Search ServiceDigitalYou can check the holdings of institutions and databases with which CiNii Research is linked at the site of CiNii Research.
Bibliographic Record
You can check the details of this material, its authority (keywords that refer to materials on the same subject, author's name, etc.), etc.
- Material Type
- 記事
- Author/Editor
- Jun KakoMasamitsu KobayashiKohei KajiwaraYoshiyasu ItoMichihiro TsubakiTakahiro Kakeda
- Publication, Distribution, etc.
- Publication Date
- 2024-04-15
- Publication Date (W3CDTF)
- 2024-04-15
- Periodical title
- JMA Journal
- No. or year of volume/issue
- 7(2)
- Volume
- 7(2)
- ISSN (Periodical Title)
- 2433-3298
- ISSN-L (Periodical Title)
- 2433-328X
- Text Language Code
- eng
- DOI
- 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181
- Persistent ID (NDL)
- info:ndljp/pid/14495112
- Collection
- Collection (Materials For Handicapped People:1)
- Collection (particular)
- 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > 電子書籍・電子雑誌 > その他
- Acquisition Basis
- インターネット資料収集保存事業（WARP）
- Date Accepted (W3CDTF)
- 2025-10-21T09:04:40+09:00
- Date Captured (W3CDTF)
- 2024-09-26
- Format (IMT)
- application/pdf
- Access Restrictions
- インターネット公開
- Availability of remote photoduplication service
- 不可
- Periodical Title (URI)
- Periodical Title (Persistent ID (NDL))
- info:ndljp/pid/14495108
- Data Provider (Database)
- 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション
- Summary, etc.
- <p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in oncology nursing.</p><p><b>Methods</b>: We searched systematically for all CRs published in the Cochrane Library in the oncology nursing field between January 2014 and April 2023. We analyzed the difference between conclusive and inconclusive outcomes using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests and identified 430 articles. However, we excluded 385 articles after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We assessed 45 full-text articles for eligibility and identified 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, we extracted 19 interventions.</p><p><b>Results</b>: The overall outcomes were 182 cases, with 51.6% (n = 94) and 48.4% (n = 88) demonstrating conclusiveness and inconclusiveness, respectively. Regarding conclusiveness, 28.0% (n = 51) and 23.6% (n = 43) reported that the studied interventions were effective and ineffective, respectively. We found that studies on interventions related to physical activity and yoga had significantly high rates of conclusive. Compared with inconclusiveness outcomes, conclusive outcomes involved significantly more studies (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusions</b>: Ultimately, these findings reveal that in the oncology nursing field, only 51% of the main outcomes of each nursing intervention in CRs were conclusive.</p>
- DOI
- 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181
- Access Restrictions
- インターネット公開
- Data Provider (Database)
- 科学技術振興機構 : J-STAGE
- Summary, etc.
- <p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in oncology nursing.</p><p><b>Methods</b>: We searched systematically for all CRs published in the Cochrane Library in the oncology nursing field between January 2014 and April 2023. We analyzed the difference between conclusive and inconclusive outcomes using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests and identified 430 articles. However, we excluded 385 articles after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We assessed 45 full-text articles for eligibility and identified 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, we extracted 19 interventions.</p><p><b>Results</b>: The overall outcomes were 182 cases, with 51.6% (n = 94) and 48.4% (n = 88) demonstrating conclusiveness and inconclusiveness, respectively. Regarding conclusiveness, 28.0% (n = 51) and 23.6% (n = 43) reported that the studied interventions were effective and ineffective, respectively. We found that studies on interventions related to physical activity and yoga had significantly high rates of conclusive. Compared with inconclusiveness outcomes, conclusive outcomes involved significantly more studies (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusions</b>: Ultimately, these findings reveal that in the oncology nursing field, only 51% of the main outcomes of each nursing intervention in CRs were conclusive.</p>
- DOI
- 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181
- Access Restrictions
- インターネット公開
- Related Material (URI)
- Data Provider (Database)
- 国立情報学研究所 : CiNii Research
- Original Data Provider (Database)
- Japan Link Center雑誌記事索引データベースCrossref
- Bibliographic ID (NDL)
- 14495112