Validation of a global scale to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork in mental health settings

• Material Type: 博士論文
• Title: Validation of a global scale to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork in mental health settings
• Author/Editor: Tomizawa, Ryoko; Yamano, Mayumi; Osako, Mitue; Hirabayashi, Naotugu; Ohshima, Nobuo; Shigeta, Masahiro; Reeves, Scott; トミザワ, リョウコ; ヤマノ, マユミ; オオサコ, ミツエ; ヒラバヤシ, ナオツグ; オオシマ, ノブオ; シゲタ, マサヒロ; 冨澤, 涼子
• Author Heading: Tomizawa, Ryoko; Yamano, Mayumi; Osako, Mitue; Hirabayashi, Naotugu; Ohshima, Nobuo; Shigeta, Masahiro; Reeves, Scott; トミザワ, リョウコ; ヤマノ, マユミ; オオサコ, ミツエ; ヒラバヤシ, ナオツグ; オオシマ, ノブオ; シゲタ, マサヒロ; 冨澤, 涼子
• Publication Date: 2017-03-25
• Publication Date (W3CDTF): 2017-03-25
• Alternative Title: 精神科における多職種チーム医療の質を測定する尺度の開発
• Pages: 1-32
• Degree Grantor: 首都大学東京
• Date Granted: 2017-03-25
• Date Granted (W3CDTF): 2017-03-25
• Dissertation Number: 乙第146号
• Degree Type: 博士（作業療法学）
• Conferring No. (Dissertation): 乙第146号
• Text Language Code: eng
• Subject Heading: interprofessional collaboration; teamwork; psychiatry; quantitative evaluation; cross-cultural comparisons
• NDLC: UT51
• Target Audience: 一般
• Note (General): Background: Few scales currently exist to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork through team members’ perceptions of working together in mental health settings. Aims: The purpose of this study was to revise and validate an interprofessional scale to assess the quality of teamwork in inpatient psychiatric units and to use it multi-nationally. Methods: A literature review was undertaken to identify evaluative teamwork tools and develop an additional 12 items to ensure a broad global focus. Focus group discussions considered adaptation to different care systems using subjective judgements from 11 participants in a pre-test of items. Data quality, construct validity, reproducibility, and internal consistency were investigated in the survey using an international comparative design. Results: Exploratory factor analysis yielded five factors with 21 items: ‘patient/community centred care’, ‘collaborative communication’, ‘interprofessional conflict’, ‘role clarification’, and ‘environment’. High overall internal consistency, reproducibility, adequate face validity, and reasonable construct validity were shown in the USA and Japan. Conclusions: The revised Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) is a valid measure to assess the quality of interprofessional teamwork in psychiatry and identifies the best strategies to improve team performance. Furthermore, the revised scale will generate more rigorous evidence for collaborative practice in psychiatry internationally.; 首都大学東京, 2017-03-25, 博士（作業療法学）, 乙第146号
• Persistent ID (NDL): info:ndljp/pid/10981558; https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/10981558
• Collection: 障害者向け資料
• Collection (Materials For Handicapped People:1): テキストデータ
• Collection (particular): 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > デジタル化資料 > 博士論文; https://dl.ndl.go.jp/collections/A00014
• Acquisition Basis: 博士論文（自動収集）
• Date Accepted (W3CDTF): 2017-11-03T04:45:49+09:00
• Format (IMT): application/pdf
• Access Restrictions: 国立国会図書館内限定公開
• Service for the Digitized Contents Transmission Service: 図書館・個人送信対象外
• Availability of remote photoduplication service: 可
• Periodical Title (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10748/00009643
• Data Provider (Database): 国立国会図書館 : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション; https://dl.ndl.go.jp

Table of Contents

2023-07-18 再収集

2023-07-18 再収集

2023-07-18 再収集